• Home
  • Training
    • HR RECERTIFCATION
    • HR CERTIFICATION PREP
    • Course Directories
    • PRODUCT FAQ
  • Podcast
  • About
    • Contact
  • SIGN IN
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIN
  • YouTube
  • RSS
  • Email
  • Podcast

Workology

The Art & Science of Work

Ad
  • Intern
  • Entry
  • Experienced
  • Senior
  • Executive

When are Background Checks Issued in the Hiring and Selection Process?

July 17, 2018 By Jessica Miller-Merrell Leave a Comment

In today’s employment market, companies are competing for talent and must move quickly to make hiring decisions. This means conducting background checks with employment contingent after a candidate has started working, or even for all applicants in high volume recruiting areas like retail, restaurant, and hospitality. This can complicate the background screening process when it comes to legal compliance.

When making personnel decisions, including hiring, retention, promotion, and reassignment,  employers want to consider the backgrounds of applicants and employees. Except for certain restrictions related to medical and genetic information, it’s not illegal for an employer to ask questions about an applicant’s or employee’s background, or to require a background check.

Most companies use some form of employment background screens to protect against hiring risks. Using background screening, recruiters and hiring managers can check for prior criminal behavior and charges, test for drug abuse, verify employment records, get employment references, and more. The goal is to create a safe (and more productive) workplace that lends itself to a company’s employer brand and work environment.

Legal Compliance and Employment Background Checks

Whenever a company uses an applicant’s or employee’s background information to make an employment decision, regardless of how you got the information, you must comply with federal laws that protect applicants and employees from discrimination. That includes discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, or religion; disability; genetic information (including family medical history); and age (40 or older). These laws are enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In all cases, make sure that you’re treating everyone equally.

Additionally, when you run background checks through a company in the business of compiling background information, you must comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces the FCRA. It’s a good idea to review the laws of your state and municipality regarding background reports or information because some states and municipalities regulate the use of that information for employment purposes.

The FCRA applies when you use consumer reports to determine eligibility for employment.

If you use consumer reports to make eligibility decisions, make sure you review the Notice to Users of Consumer Reports. Consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) are required to give you this document to inform you of your obligations under the FCRA. Other federal or local laws also may apply to your use of consumer reports.

When you get a consumer report, you must certify to the CRA the purpose for which you will use it. Why is this important? When consumers request copies of their files, CRAs must inform them about who has obtained reports on them. The candidate or employee must be informed that a background (credit) check is being conducted and that the terms of employment may be revoked based on information gathered during the background check. Additionally, the candidate or employee must be notified of any adverse action, and given the opportunity to dispute inaccurate information.

What is Adverse Action?

In short, adverse action means that a company is considering not hiring an applicant based on the information in a background check report that negatively affects the applicant’s employment. This could mean denying employment, but can also mean denying a promotion or transfer. Pre-Adverse And Adverse Action Notices are processes that inform the applicant that the company is considering not moving forward with the employment process.

The adverse action notice may be provided verbally, electronically, or in writing. I cannot emphasize enough that a written adverse action notice is best because it provides proof of compliance. The CRA that provided you with the consumer report may have a model adverse action notice.

So what happens when the background screen finds information about a candidate that might cause a company to deny employment? How should a company handle the situation with the candidate, and – more importantly – how do they handle it in a fair and legally compliant way? Today’s economy means that you may be interviewing and screening more candidates than ever before, along with a higher risk for adverse action complaints based on employment rejection.

If a candidate makes it far enough through your interview process that they are a finalist for your open position, or have already been hired contingent on a background check, but is then rejected due to information uncovered through a background screening, the FCRA requires that the employer issues a notice to a candidate allowing them the opportunity to provide more information. This is the pre-adverse action notice.

In order to maintain FCRA compliance, the pre-adverse action notice should be sent (or provided) to potential candidates before making a final decision. If the pre-adverse action notice is sent to the candidate before adverse action (deciding not to hire the candidate) is taken, it is an opportunity to allow the candidate (or employee in the case of contingent or current employee background checks) the opportunity to dispute the information contained in the background report.

It also give you, as the employer, time to provide the required information. As part of the notification process under the FCRA you must provide the candidate with a disclosure that includes a copy of the Federal Trade Commission document “A Summary of Your Rights Under the FCRA.” It’s imperative to send this notice before you’ve made a final hiring decision in order to avoid legal liability. In cases of current employees, the notice should make clear that the terms of their employment are subject to change or invalidation based on information discovered during the background check process.

While the FCRA doesn’t have specific guidelines for how long to wait between pre-adverse and adverse action notices to candidates (it does state that five business days is “reasonable”), since the goal is to give the candidate time to respond or correct the adverse information, I recommend 15 days between notices – at the minimum. And again, this should be in writing.

The only way to stay on top of your time-to-hire and remain compliant legally when it comes to background checks is to make amendments to your employment contract. The most important factor is to have a plan in place before conducting checks that includes clear language on an employment contract that the offer or initial employment period is extended and viable only if the background check is complete and returns no adverse information.

Related Posts

HRIS human resources information system job description salary rangeHR Information Specialist Job Description Template
just say no to dangerous winter travelJust Say NO to Dangerous Winter Travel
a coo's three secrets to continuous performance management successA COO’s Three Secrets to Continuous Performance Management Success
3 reasons to unmask your anonymous employee surveysThree Reasons to Unmask Your Anonymous Employee Surveys
more conversations are essential for employee motivationWhen it Comes to Motivating Employees, More Conversations Are Essential
how to use recognition to retain top talentHow to Use Recognition to Retain Your Top Talent
to boost results from performance management, focus on helping managersTo Boost Results From Your Performance Management Program, Focus on Helping Your Managers
continuous performance management employeeWhy Your Company NEEDS to Transition to Continuous Performance Management
the top five problems with annual reviews and how to fix themThe Top 5 Problems With Annual Reviews (and How to Fix Them)
stop managing employees and start developing themStop Managing Your Employees and Start Developing Them

Filed Under: HR Tagged With: adverse action, background check, background checks, fair credit employment act, FCRA, hiring

Jessica Miller-Merrell

About Jessica Miller-Merrell

Jessica Miller-Merrell, is workplace change agent and author focused on human resources and talent acquisition living in Austin, TX. Recognized by Forbes as a top 50 social media influencer. She's the founder of Workology. Follow her on Twitter, @jmillermerrell.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ad

Categorically Speaking

  • Business
  • HR
  • Leadership
  • Life
  • Tech
  • Podcast
  • Reviews
  • Work
  • Social Media
  • Sourcing
  • Recruiting
  • Career
  • Millenials

Workology Popular Posts

  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Ep 170 – Becoming a More Strategic HR Leader and Business Partner Ep 170 – Becoming a More Strategic HR Leader and Business Partner
  • HR Information Specialist Job Description Template HR Information Specialist Job Description Template
  • Ep 169 – Inclusion and the Use of Gender-Neutral Pronouns in the Workplace Ep 169 – Inclusion and the Use of Gender-Neutral Pronouns in the Workplace
  • Just Say NO to Dangerous Winter Travel Just Say NO to Dangerous Winter Travel
  • A COO’s Three Secrets to Continuous Performance Management Success A COO’s Three Secrets to Continuous Performance Management Success
  • Three Reasons to Unmask Your Anonymous Employee Surveys Three Reasons to Unmask Your Anonymous Employee Surveys
  • When it Comes to Motivating Employees, More Conversations Are Essential When it Comes to Motivating Employees, More Conversations Are Essential
  • How to Use Recognition to Retain Your Top Talent How to Use Recognition to Retain Your Top Talent
  • To Boost Results From Your Performance Management Program, Focus on Helping Your Managers To Boost Results From Your Performance Management Program, Focus on Helping Your Managers
  • Why Your Company NEEDS to Transition to Continuous Performance Management Why Your Company NEEDS to Transition to Continuous Performance Management
  • Today Week Month All
  • 3 Sample Email Templates Job Seekers Can Send to A Recruiter 3 Sample Email Templates Job Seekers Can Send to A Recruiter (544,030 views)
  • 4 External Factors that Affect Human Resource Management 4 External Factors that Affect Human Resource Management (156,546 views)
  • 27 Companies Who Hire Adults With Autism 27 Companies Who Hire Adults With Autism (127,937 views)
  • Employee Rights: Time Off Requests for Exempt vs. Non-Exempt Employee Rights: Time Off Requests for Exempt vs. Non-Exempt (121,672 views)
  • The Difference Between an HR Business Partner & Just HR The Difference Between an HR Business Partner & Just HR (120,193 views)
  • The Perfect Revenge: How to Quit a Job & Resign at Work The Perfect Revenge: How to Quit a Job & Resign at Work (58,072 views)
  • Manner Monday: Requesting an Appointment for Conference Call Manner Monday: Requesting an Appointment for Conference Call (55,013 views)
  • 10 Reasons Why I Love Being an HR Professional 10 Reasons Why I Love Being an HR Professional (53,781 views)
  • 5 Employee Twitter Bio Disclaimers You Should Add Today 5 Employee Twitter Bio Disclaimers You Should Add Today (43,307 views)
  • How to Use a Google X-Ray Search to Find Hidden Candidates How to Use a Google X-Ray Search to Find Hidden Candidates (39,643 views)
Ajax spinner

Copyright © 2019 · Workology Inc. All Rights Reserved. Site Design by The Spinbird Group.

  • Contributing
  • Advertising
  • Disclaimer
  • Press