flaws, applicant, ats, hr tech

Five Flaws in Your ATS

Scroll down to read more!

Five Flaws in Your ATS

Scroll down to read more!
flaws, applicant, ats, hr tech

Table of Contents

The face of recruiting has changed greatly over the last decade, but the tools our industry uses have essentially stayed the same. While there are a few that are able to offer what a recruiter really needs the same old standard ATS that most of us use has been around for decades. This creates a major problem for our industry as the abilities of an ATS don’t match up with the way recruiters work now and what we need it to be able to do.

Of course there was a time when an ATS did almost everything a recruiter needed it to do. It was created for applicant storage and compliance and it does a great job at those things. However, it’s not a marketing and engagement engine, which presents limitations in what you can do to ensure candidate experience and engagement. You can get creative and piecemeal together multiple software products to get what you need, but after adding MailChimp, Gmail or Chrome extensions and your typical ATS to the mix, you have a patched together system that is inefficient, flawed and probably still not capable of all that you need.

Five Flaws in Your ATS

The future of recruiting is changing and the systems we use must evolve as well. A recruiter’s job goes far beyond what an ATS can do. We source, engage and build relationships, and we need a system that supports us in those areas. Take a look below to find out about the five main flaws in your ATS.

No Dynamic Search

Recruiters are juggling more than ever before as they work to find the best candidates for multiple job openings. We need our system to assist us in this area by providing a dynamic search and job matching that does the initial dirty work for us, identifying candidates that are qualified for a position without us having to weed through resumes. Most standard applicant tracking systems don’t have this capability, but it’s a must for the ATS of the future.

Ability to Add Notes

Recruiters today are more focused on the candidate experience and fostering relationships, which means there’s more communication happening in recruiting than ever before. It order to make the most of this groundwork you lay, you’ve got to keep track of those conversations. Unfortunately, that’s not a capability most ATSs have. Recruiters should be able to add notes from a phone call or social interaction with ease.

Profile Sharing

Your standard ATS probably doesn’t give you the ability to connect a candidate’s social profile with their ATS profile with ease, or share those within your system. Since so much of the recruiting we do happens through social, this is a big hindrance and something that a modern ATS absolutely must allow for.

Scheduling Reminders

We’re all busy, but following through on what you tell your hiring managers and candidates is so important. Applicant tracking systems may help you keep things organized, but most don’t support you in being timely. Of course you can use your Google or other email-connected calendar to set reminders, but this is a perfect example of how integrating a capability could save time and cut down on mistakes.

Modern Workflow Management

The standard ATS was created before we began using multiple channels to help manage our workflow. The days of using just a desk calendar and phone are over, but that’s what your standard ATS probably supports. Now we use text message, phone, automated email and more, so an ATS that helps manage workflow on multiple fronts just makes sense.

Did you like this post? Share it!

4 Comments

  1. What you didn’t mention and that seems blatantly obvious:

    ATS must stop being the point of entry for applicants. Period.

    ATS screens out good candidates.

    ATS if it exists at all should be a tool for the recruiter not a hammer the company uses against applicants.

    Asking applicants to create accounts and wade through tedious multiple screens transcribing their resume and CVs field by field, using “mandatory” fields to force candidates to disclose salary history that is none of the company’s business anyway, all for the opportunity to be “screened” for the recruiter’s convenience because they didn’t spec the job correctly and think they are inundated with inappropriate applicants, is why your ATS is filled with unusable junk.

    Good people confronted with horrible ATS experiences when they would like to express interest in a position just click away and never apply.

    Why would a good candidate waste 15 to 30 minutes of his/her life filling in an ATS record that would probably never be looked at by a human being?

  2. Hi Jessica I agree with your observation on ATS. My 22 years in the business and 17 as the President of a staffing company, I’ve seen many recruiting tools, software, come and go. ATS’ have stuck around as a disappointing necessity, instead of me elaborating on the negatives. Have you found an alternative that works?

  3. Great summary, Jessica. I believe this is why there’s a growing industry of complementary ATS integration tools that solve a lot of these frustrations.

    In your experience, do you find the more recent ATS companies (e.g., SmartRecruiters, Lever, Greenhouse) are better at including features that address these workflow problems? Or are these still some glaring gaps?

Comments are closed.

A Word From Our Sponsors

Ads help make Workology resources free for everyone. We respect your privacy. To see our Privacy Policy click here.

Recommended Posts

HR Certification Podcast Episode 12: Answering Your SHRM & HRCI Exam Questions

In this episode of the HR Certification Podcast, we are reviewing the 4/5ths rule as well as answering your SHRM and HRCI questions....

How to combine human and AI hiring practices

The world changed in November 2022 when ChatGPT launched, and we’ve never looked back. Whether it’s producing a bank of content or condensing meeting...

HR Certification Podcast Episode 13: HR Metrics & Formula Review for HRCI & SHRM

In this episode of the HR Certification Podcast, we are reviewing the HR-to-staff ratio as well as the cost of vacancy (COV)....

HR Certification Podcast Episode 14: Leadership Review for HRCI & SHRM Exams

In this episode of the HR Certification Podcast, we are reviewing the balanced scorecard as well as types of scorecards within HR....

Checkout Our Products

Ads help make Workology resources free for everyone. We respect your privacy. To see our Privacy Policy click here.

More From Workology

HR Certification Podcast Episode 14: Leadership Review for HRCI & SHRM Exams

In this episode of the HR Certification Podcast, we are reviewing the balanced scorecard as well as types of scorecards within HR.

HR Certification Podcast Episode 13: HR Metrics & Formula Review for HRCI & SHRM

In this episode of the HR Certification Podcast, we are reviewing the HR-to-staff ratio as well as the cost of vacancy (COV).

How to combine human and AI hiring practices

Click on read more to open this post on our blog.

HR Certification Podcast Episode 12: Answering Your SHRM & HRCI Exam Questions

In this episode of the HR Certification Podcast, we are reviewing the 4/5ths rule as well as answering your SHRM and HRCI questions.